Praseetha Mohanan v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36106 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------ PRASEETHA MOHANAN WIFE OF ARUN KUMAR, AGED 25 YEARS UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, OKKAL-683 550 PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENTS:
----------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.
3. THE DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ERNAKULAM AT KAKKANAD-682 030.
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 691.
5. THE MANAGER,SREE NARAYANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, OKKAL-683 550, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 36106 of 2015 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- ----------------------------------- EXT.P1 - COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 15-07-2010.
EXT.P2 - COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER 2014-15 DATED 19-07-2014.
EXT.P3 - COPY OF THE STAFF LIST.
EXT.P4 - COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 28-03-2015.
EXT.P5 - COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 05-05-2015.
EXT.P6 - COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO. 17160/2015 DATED 09-07-2015.
EXT.P7 - COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13-09-2015.
EXT.P8 - COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 30-10-2015 WITHOUT EXHIBITS. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.36106 of 2015-K --------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P8 revision petition pending before the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P8 within a reasonable time. In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P8 revision petition of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the first respondent will consider in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.
//True Copy// P.A. to Judge.
sp/30/11/15