Sudhakaran v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36270 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
----------------------- SUDHAKARAN, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.KUMARAN, KALATHITHARA VEEDU, NJARAKKAL VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.S.BABU GIREESAN SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. PIN-682 030
2. THE THAHSILDAR, KOCHI TALUK, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM-682 002
3. MURALI, S/O.KUMARAN, KALATHITHARA, THANNIPADOM, MANNAM.P.O, PARAVOOR-683 520.
4. RAJA, S/O.KUMARAN, KALATHITHARA, ERAMALLOOR, CHANDIROOR.P.O, ALAPPUZHA-688 547.
R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
WP(C).No. 36270 of 2015 (G) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA ISSUED IN O.A.NO.11707/70 DATED 25.5.71 OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL VYPEEN.
P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 30.5.2015 P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 6/9/2015 TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT P3(A) TRUE COPY OF THE THANDAPER REGISTER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).No.36270/2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 1st Day of December, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner approached the second respondent by Exhibit P2 to cancel the transfer of registry. According to the petitioner, the transfer of registry effected in favour of the third and fourth respondents is illegal. The property in question is having an extent of 10 cents comprised in Survey No. 338/4 of Njarakkal Village. The petitioner also refers to the report of the Village Officer showing the legal heirs of the original owner of the property. Exhibit P3 is the said report.
2.
Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision Exhibit P2 after hearing the petitioner as well as respondents 3 and 4 within a period of two months.
The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms