← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36324/2015disposed of

K.R.Joshila v. The State Of Kerala

2015-12-01Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36324 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- K.R.JOSHILA AGED 27 YEARS UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT MAKRERI SANKARA VILASAM GRAMENA PADASALA U.P.SCHOOL P.O.MAKRERI, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENTS:

------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR - 670 002.

4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR SOUTH, P.O.CHAKKARAKKAL - 670 003.

5. THE MANAGER MAKRERI SANKARA VILASAM GRAMENA PADASALA U.P.SCHOOLP.O.MAKRERI KANNUR DISTRICT - 670 622.

R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 36324 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 2.6.2014 EXT.P-2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 28.3.2015 EXT.P-3:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DATED 13.10.2015 EXT.P-4:

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DATED 18.11.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 36324 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P4 revision dated 18.11.2015 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2nd respondent.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 1/12/15