Deena Panicker v. Superintendent Of Police, Kottayam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36431 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS :
-----------------
1. DEENA PANICKER, AGED 55 YEARS W/O. LATE VASAVAPANICKER, POOTHARA KIZHAKKINEZHATH THANNERMUKKOM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
2. SHALIMA CHAKRAVARTHY, AGED 26 YEARS D/O.LATE VASAVAPANICKER, POOTHARA KIZHAKKINEZHATH THANNERMUKKOM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
3. SHANTHALIN CHAKRAVARTHY, AGED 23 YEARS D/O. LATE VASAVAPANICKER, POOTHARA KIZHAKKINEZHATH THANNERMUKKOM VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT BY ADV. SMT.PREETHA ANIL RAVEENDRAN RESPONDENTS :
-------------------
1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM 686 001
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VAIKOM POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM 686 001
3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VAIKOM POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM 686 001
4. MANOHARAN S/O.NANU, CHENAPPADI VEEDU, KUDAVECHOOR VECHOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM 686 001
5. BHASKARAN S/O.VAVA, AICKARAPARAMBIL VEDDU, KUDAVECHOOR VECHOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM 686 001 R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.C.R. SYAM KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 36431 of 2015 (D) -------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
----------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 21-08-2014. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE SURVEY PLAN IN SURVEY NO 461/1,461/B. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO 1020/2015 OF VAIKKOM POLICE STATION.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------- NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J. & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 36431 OF 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2015
JUDGMENT
Shaffique, J.
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking police protection alleging that respondents 4 and 5 are obstructing the petitioners from putting boundary stones in the property belonging to them after fixation of boundary.
2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and on perusal of the materials produced, we do not think that police can interfere in the matter and remedy of the petitioners is to put boundary stones at the instance of Taluk Surveyor. The petitioner can approach competent authorities and seek appropriate directions.
With the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
Ashok Bhushan, Chief Justice.
A.M. Shaffique, Judge.
ttb/02/12