P.Raji v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36443 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- P.RAJI, AGED 35 YEARS WIFE OF ANIL KUMAR UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT P.C GURUVILASAM BASIC UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL P.O UMMANCHIRA KANNUR DIST. 670 649 BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. GENERAL EDUCATION DEPT.

SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE DIST. EDUCATIONAL OFFICER THELLICHERRY, KANNUR DIST. 670 101 3.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER TELLICHERRY NORTH, KANNUR DIST. 670 101 4.

THE MANAGER P.C GURUVILASAM BASIC UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, P.O UMMANCHIRA, KANNUR DIST. 670 649 5.

THE HEADMISTRESS, P.C GURUVILASAM BASIC UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, P.O UMMANCHIRA KANNUR DIST. 670 649 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 36443 of 2015 (E) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 1.6.10 EXT.P2 COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO. 4932/2014/G.EDN. DTD. 12.11.14 OF THE GOVT.

EXT.P2(A) COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONL OFFICER DTD. 17.12.14 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE G.O(MS) NO.275/99/G.EDN. DTD. 9.11.99 EXT.P4 COPY OF THE DECISION REPORTED IN 2009(4) KLT 514 DTD. 30.09.2009 EXT.P5 COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 3.6.13 EXT.P6 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DTD. 9.7.15 EXT.P7 COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER DTD. 7.8.15 BY THE MANAGER EXT.P8 COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 6.10.15 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.36443 of 2015 - E ====================== Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P7 appeal filed before the 2nd respondent. The appeal is filed on 07.08.2015

2. In such circumstance, the 2nd respondent definitely will have to look at the appeal filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. Notice to be issued to the petitioner and the Manager. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 2nd respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/2/12/2015 // true copy // P.A To Judge.