High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36516/2015disposed of

M.V Sathyan v. The Chairman And Managing Director

2015-12-10Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/19TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36516 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

--------------------------------------------- M.V SATHYAN, AGED 52 YEARS S/O.V.V.VASAVAN, MULLASSERY, MUHAMMA.P.O ALAPPUZHA, WORKING AS JUNIOR MANAGER SUPPLYCO SUB DEPOT, VELLAYIL KOZHIKODE.(NOW ON LEAVE).

BY ADVS.SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.K.AKHIL RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------------------------------

1. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUPPLYCO, HEAD OFFICE, ERNAKULAM PIN-683020.

2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, SUPPLYCO, REGIONAL OFFICE, KOZHIKODE PIN-673004.

R BY SMT.MOLLY JACOB,SC,SUPPLYCO THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 36516 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT. P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASST.REGIONAL MANAGER,KOZHIKODE DATED 24/2/2015 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 25/2/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.36516 of 2015 - L ====================== Dated this the 10th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P2 request filed before the 1st respondent. The request is filed on 25.02.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the request filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is also submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent that the leave for November is sanctioned and the leave applied for the subsequent period is under consideration. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/10/12/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.