← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36548/2015disposed of

Feroke Co-Operative Babuor Contract v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-03Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36548 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- FEROKE CO-OPERATIVE LABUOR CONTRACT SOCIETY LTD.NO.D-2855, FEROKE P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 631, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.J.MATHEW SRI.EBIN MATHEW SRI.PAUL VARGHESE(ERNAKULAM) RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FISHERIES AND PORTS (D) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PORTS, VALIYATHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 008.

3. THE SENIOR PORT CONSERVATOR, BEYPORE PORT, BEYPORE P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 015. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 36548 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- P1 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE SOCIETY. P2 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD.14.11.2014. P3 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD.13.11.2015. P4 :

A TRUE COPY OF PERMIT DTD.18.11.2015.

P5 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.10.8.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 36548 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a Co-operative Society engaged in manual dredging. They approached this Court alleging that unreasonable restriction has been placed on them for sale of sand. They highlighted their grievances by Ext.P5 before the 2nd respondent. In the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P5 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioner as well as the similarly situated societies. sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE