← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36866/2015disposed of

Adv. Vinay Ramdas v. Marriage Officer, Thrissur

2015-12-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36866 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- ADV. VINAY RAMDAS, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.RAMADASAN, KRISHNAPADAM, GREEN GARDENS, KOTTAPPURAM ROAD, P.O. POONKUNNAM, TRICHUR DISTRICT-680 002.

BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVINDRA NATH RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE MARRIAGE OFFICER, THRISSUR, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 003.

2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, VANCHIYUR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 035.

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, VANCHIYUR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695 035.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 36866 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1. A TRUE COPY OF THE VOTERS INDENTIFICATION CARD ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P2. A TRUE COPY OF THE RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED TOT HE PARTY THE PETITIONER INTENDS TO MARRY.

EXT.P3. A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE INTENDED MARRIAGE DATED 30/11/2015. EXT.P4. A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE INTENDED MARRIAGE DATED 18/5/2015. EXT.P5. A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED ON PAYMENT OF STATUTORY FEES DATED 18/5/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 36866 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 8th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner approached this Court on account of the fact that the first respondent refused to accept notice issued u/s 5 of the Special Marriage Act.

2.

The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the petitioner did not appear and furnish any notice.

3.

This stand of the first respondent has been strongly refuted by the counsel for the petitioner. Taking note of the fact that the petitioner is intent to marry under the special marriage Act, the first respondent is directed to receive notice from the petitioner without insisting any condition. If the fist respondent finds that any defect exists in respect of the notice necessarily that shall be responded in writing. Therefore the petitioner shall appear before the first respondent on 11.12.2015 at 11 a.m. sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE

- : 2 :-