High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36881/2015disposed of

K.N.Thampi v. Kerala Water Authority, Thiruvananthapuram

2015-12-15Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36881 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K.N.THAMPI, AGED 54 YEARS S/O.K.V.NELSON, WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER-1 PROJECT DIVISION, KWA, PERUMBAVOOR.

BY ADVS.SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI SRI.BIJU GEORGE (VADASSERY) SMT.V.T.KAVITHA RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALABHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.

2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (GENERAL) JALABHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.

R BY SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 36881 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1.

THE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.E1-1397/2002 DATED 5/10/2015.

EXT.P2.

THE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.13814E4(A)/2014/KWA DATED 3/12/2015.

EXT.P3.

THE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O.(P) 12/04/P & ARD DATED 10/9/2004.

EXT.P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 4.12.15. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.36881 of 2015 - I ====================== Dated this the 15th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P4 representation filed before the 1st respondent. The representation is filed on 04.12.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the representation filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, at any rate within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/15/12/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.