High Court of KeralaWP(C)/36895/2015disposed of

P.K.Dasan v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-12-073 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 36895 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- P.K.DASAN, PANTHAYIL V ATTAVALAPPIL HOUSE, P.O.KOONAMUCHI, PANISSERY, THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR - 680 003.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 36895 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE TAX TOKEN.

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE EXISTING TEMPORARY PERMIT FOR THE PERIOD 19.10.2014 TO 18.12.2014 DTD.17.10.2014.

EXT,P3: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RTA THRISSUR DTD.7.8.2014. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE EXISTING TEMPORARY PERMIT FOR THE PERIOD 30.8.2015 TO 12.9.2015.

EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE EXISTING TEMPORARY PERMIT FOR THE PERIOD 30.8.2015 TO 12.9.2015.

EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT APPLICATION DATED 23.11.2015 ON THE ROUTE PAVARATTY - THRISSUR WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 46/C 3303 IN PLACE OF KL 8/AB 4555.

EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT DTD.23.11.2015. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.8.5.2015 IN WPC.NO.13874/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K.HARILAL, J.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ W.P.(C) No.36895 of 2015 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Dated this the 7th day of December, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is an applicant for the grant of a regular permit on the route Pavaratty-Thrissur with respect to stage carriage bearing Registration No.KL46/C-3303. The said application for regular permit is being considered and in the meanwhile, the petitioner applied for a temporary permit by Ext.P6. The grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P6 has not been considered so far. It is only appropriate that Ext.P6 temporary permit application be considered and orders be passed at the earliest.

2. In the above view of the matter, the Secretary, R.T.A., is directed to consider Ext.P6 and pass orders accordingly, at the earliest, at any rate, within a period ten days from today.

This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- K. HARILAL, JUDGE okb.