Babu Ezhuvanthala @ Krishnakumar T.S. v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37048 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
---------------------- BABU EZHUVANTHALA @ KRISHNAKUMAR T.S., S/O.SANKARAN EZHUTHACHAN, AGED 59 YEARS, THACHAMPARAMBATH VEEDU, POST EZHUVANTHALA, NELLAYA VILLAGE, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL SMT.ANJALI G.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD, COLLECTORATE, POST PALAKKAD, PIN - 678 014.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPPALAM TALUK, POST OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 101.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, PATTAMBI TALUK, POST PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 303.
5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NELLAYA VILLAGE, POST NELLAYA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 335.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
WP(C).No. 37048 of 2015 (E) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:
THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE THE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA DATED NIL.
EXT.P-2:
THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE NAME OF MAKKAL CHARITABLE TRUST DATED NIL.
EXT.P-3:
THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29.7.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).No.37048/2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 8th Day of December, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner approached the respondents to include Nellaya Village in Pattambi Taluk instead of Ottappalam Taluk as per Exhibits P1 and P2. Petitioner refers to Exhibit P3 report of the third respondent to substantiate his plea. It is submitted that no decision has been taken by the District Collector.
2.
Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the District Collector to take appropriate decision in this matter after adverting to the report of the Tahsildar, Ottappalam within a period of two months.
The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms