High Court of KeralaWP(C)/37082/2015disposed of

Elizabeth Kurien v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-15Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37082 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- ELIZABETH KURIEN, AGED 55 YEARS W/O.P.S.MATHEW, MEMANA PUTHEN VEEDU, KUTTIKANAM P.O. PEERMEDU, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.ESM.KABEER RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2. THE MANAGER ST.THOMAS COLLEGE, RANNI, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 688 001. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 37082 of 2015 (I) ----------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT ISSUED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA DATED 11/11/1983.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT DATED 19/10/2002.

EXT. P3:

TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 3/11/2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.37082 of 2015 - I ====================== Dated this the 15th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks consideration of Ext.P3 representation filed before the 1st respondent on 03.11.2015, on the basis of Ext.P2 order issued by the Government. The learned Government Pleader specifically contends that Ext.P2 is not at all applicable to the petitioner.

2. In such circumstance, since the consideration alone is sought, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the representation filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/15/12/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.