High Court of KeralaWP(C)/37126/2015disposed of

Tessy Mathew v. Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies

2015-12-08Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37126 of 2015 (M) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS : - -----------------------

1. TESSY MATHEW, NEERALAKOTTIYIL HOUSE, ARUNOOTTIMANGALAM P.O.

2. ANNAMMA THOMAS, KUZHITHOTTU HOUSE, MEENACHIL P.O., PALA.

3. M.V. KURIAN, MEEMPALLIL HOUSE, ARUNOOTTIMANGALAM P.O.

BY ADVS.SRI.SHAJI THOMAS SRI.BINU PAUL SRI.B.RAJESH (KOTTAYAM) RESPONDENTS :- -------------------------

1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM - 686 002.

2. THE KADUTHURUTHY CO-OPERATIVE RUBBER MARKETING AND PROCESSING SOCIETY LTD No. 1397, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KADUTHURUTHY - 686 604.

3. THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT OF THE KADUTHURUTHY CO-OPERATIVE RUBBER MARKETING AND PROCESSING SOCIETY LTD No. 1397, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, PIN - 686 004.

R1 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. VINCENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 37126 of 2015 (M) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE PHOTOCOPIES OF THE FIXED DEPOSIT RECEIPTS OF PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 ON 07.09.2013, 03.07.2012 AND ON 12.01.2013. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE 1st PETITIONER BEFORE THE ASST. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ON 28.10.2005.

EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.07.2015 IN W.P. (C) No. 956/2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL.

// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE DMR/-

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 37126 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 08th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

In the light of the directions given in Exhibit P3 judgment involving the same respondents, this Court having felt that this writ petition, too, raises an identical issue, disposes of the writ petition with the same directions.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-