← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/37189/2015disposed of

P K Shyju v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Malappuram

2015-12-17Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37189 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- P K SHYJU AGED 40 YEARS PARAKUZHIYIL HOUSE, THURUTHIYAD.P.O.BALUSSERY KOZHIKODE BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MALAPPURAM-676 505 R BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 37189 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT DT. 1/10.15 ISSUING TIMING IN RESPECT OF STAGE CRRIAGE KL-56/J 5859 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT DT. 24/9/15 ISSUING TIMING IN RESPECT OF STAGE CARRIAGE KL-56/J5959 EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIOENR BEFORE THE RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF THE TIMING ISSUED TO STAGE CARRIAGE KL56/56/J 5859 DT. 19/11/15 EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF THE TIMING ISSUED TO STAGE CARRIAGE KL-56/J 5959 D.T 19/11/15 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.37189 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Exts. P3 and P4 objections filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Exts. P3 and P4 objections and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

sks