← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/37334/2015disposed of

M.C.Beena v. The Deputy Director Of Education

2015-12-09Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37334 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ M.C.BEENA, AGED 39 YEARS MANAGER, AUP SCHOOL, PILASSERY KUNNAMANGALAM P.O.

KOZHIKODE-673 571.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR SRI.S.ANEESH RESPONDENTS:

---------------------- 1.

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001.

2.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 571.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 37334 of 2015 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- ----------------------------------- EXT.P1 - COPY OF APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF MANAGEMENT DATED 13.07.2015.

EXT.P2 - COPY OF ORDER DATED 19.09.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 - COPY OF APPEAL DATED 21.10.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.37334 of 2015-N --------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of December, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P3 appeal pending before the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 within a reasonable period.

In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 appeal of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the first respondent will consider in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

//True Copy// P.A. to Judge.

sp/09/12/15