High Court of KeralaWP(C)/37749/2015disposed of

Saboora v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-14Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37749 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- SABOORA, W/O. ABDUL AZEEZ, KARINGAMTHURUTHI PARAMBIL, MATTANCHERRY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS, PRISONS HEADQUARTERS, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695012.

3. JAIL SUPERINTENDENT , CENTRAL PRISON, VIYYUR, THRISSUR, PIN-680010.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 37749 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.20.8.2011 IN CRL.RP.NO.1555/2002 OF THIS COURT.

EXT.P2: THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMETN DTD.4.4.2014 IN WPC.9744/2014. EXT.P3: THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.14.7.2014 BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: THE TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DTD.25.7.2014 FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5: THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.18390/2014 DTD. 6.8.2014. EXT.P6: THE TRUE COPY OF THE CONTINUING APPLICATION FOR PAROLE DTD.27.11.2014.

EXT.P7: THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DTD.27.11.2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

===================== W.P(C)No.37749 of 2015 ========================== Dated this the 14th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the wife of convict named Abdul Azeez, who is undergoing imprisonment in Central Prison, Viyyur, Thrissur.

2. Petitioner approached the 3rd respondent by Ext.P6 for granting parole to Sri. Abdul Azeez. The only prayer of the petitioner is that Ext.P6 may directed to be considered.

3. The petitioner has been granted parole based on the unamended Rules on earlier occasion pursuant to direction of this Court in Writ petition No.18390/2014. Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P6 as a continuation of the earlier parole granted to the convict.

4. In the light of the above, the petitioner's request for parole shall be considered as a continuation of earlier parole. Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE vdv/14/12/15