Sreeletha.S v. District Educational Officer, Kottarakkara

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37773 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SREELETHA.S , U.P.S.A SREE VIDHYADHI RAJA MEMORIAL MODEL HIGH SCHOOL ['SVMMHS'], VENDAR NOW WORKING AS UPSA [PROTECTED], GOVT. UPS, KUMARANCHIRA, RESIDING AT AYIKUNNATHU VILAYIL VEEDU KADAMPANAD PO 691 552 BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA -691506 2.

ADDL. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION [GENERAL] THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 3.

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. GENERAL EDUCATION DEPT., SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 4.

THE MANAGER, SREE VIDHYADHI RAJA MEMORIAL MODEL HIGH SCHOOL, VENDAR PO, KOTTARAKKAR 691 507 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 37773 of 2015 (V) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE PERSONAL MEMORANDA AND HISTORY AND VERIFICATION OF SERVICE OF THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P2 COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER NO. D.DIS/B2/3172/14/2014 DTD. 15.7.14 IN RESPECT OF SREE VIDHYADHI RAJA MEMORIAL MODEL HIGH SCHOOL ['SVMMHS'] ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 COPY OF THE ORDER NO. ET[1]70370/2014/DPI/K.DIS DTD. 12.12.14 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4 COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 5.11.15 EXT.P5 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 30.11.15 IN W.P.C NO. 24013/2015 OF THI SHON'BLE COURT.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.37773 of 2015 - V ====================== Dated this the 15th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P4 revision filed before the 3rd respondent. The revision is filed on 05.11.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 3rd respondent definitely will have to look at the revision filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the Manager and any other affected parties, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 3rd respondent will consider, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/15/12/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.