← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/37803/2015disposed of

Abdul Nisar.A v. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kasaragod

2015-12-14Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37803 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ ABDUL NISAR A., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED KUNHI, RESIDING AT H/NO. 418A (8/222A)8, PUTHIGE GP, FIRDOUS HOUSE, EDNAD P.O., KUMBALA, KASARAGOD - 671 321.

BY ADVS.SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ SRI.IVANS C. CHAMAKKAL RESPONDENT:

---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD - 671 321.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 37803/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION FOR THE PETITIONER'S VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL-13-S-4972 EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE STAGE CARRIAGE PERMIT VIDE PERMIT NO.ST 14/3111/1990 RENEWED FROM 06.06.2015 TO 05.06.2020. EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER NO. C1/8569/02 DATED 24.09.2002.

EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 01.10.2015 ALONG WITH PROPOSED TIMINGS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 37803 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P4 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS