Baduvan Kunni v. The Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37837 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ BADUVAN KUNHI, S/O. ABDULLA KUNHI, PAYYALADKA HOUSE, BADIADKA G.P., P.O. PERDALA.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS:

----------------------- 1.

THE SECRETARY, THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD 671 121.

2.

ABDULLA, S/O. MAMMUNHI, BIRIMINADKE HOUSE, BELO P.O., KASARAGOD 671 321.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 37837/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

ncd

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 37837 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The validity of Ext.P1 temporary permit issued to the second respondent expires on 18.12.2015. The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 representation voicing his objection for the reissue of temporary permit.

2.

I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation as and when the second respondent put in application for reissue of temporary permit. Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the second respondent shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks