Haneefa v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37842 of 2015 (E) PETITIONER:

-------------------------- HANEEFA S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN ADEEPATTU HOUSE POOZHIKUNNU, B.P. ANGADI P.O.

TIRUR, MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY SHANAVAS S/O. ASSAINAR HAJI CHEEMPALI HOUSE CHEERAN KADAPPURAM RAYIRIMANGALAM TANUR, MALAPPURAM BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM - 676 505 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 37842 of 2015 (E) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 11.07.2012 P2 :

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION 30.11.2015 P3 :

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C). NO. 27145/2015 DATED 9.9.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J W.P.(C). NO. 37842 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P2 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS