Renju Kuruvila v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37867 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS:

-------------------- 1.

RENJU KURUVILA, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. P.K. KURUVILLA, ARNNILL HOUSE, CHETHACKAL P.O., RANNI.

2.

C.V. SABU, S/O. VASUDEVAN, AGED 45 YEARS, CHOORKKUTTIYIL HOUSE, MAMMOODU, CHANGANACHERRY.

BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENTS:

----------------------- 1.

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM 686 001.

2.

SIMILI SHIBU, KANIYAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUTTAPPALLY P.O., MUKKUTTUTHARA, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER E.R. ANILKUMAR, ETTACKAL HOUSE, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 124.

3.

PRAKASH T JOHN, THONDANKULANGARA HOUSE, KADAYANIKKATTU, KANGAZHA, CHANGANACHERRY 686 541. 4.

THOMAS V PHILIP, VAVOLICKAL HOUSE, PULICKALKAVALA P.O., KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M.M. MATHAI, MELEDATH HOUSE, EDAYARICKAPUZHA, KANGAZHA, KOTTAYAM - 686 541.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 37867/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER'S STAGE CARRIAGE KL-33/C 5112 EXHIBIT P2 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE ORIGINALLY ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO OPERATE ON THE ROUTE KURUMBANMOOZHY-KOTTAYAM EXHIBIT P3 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29.10.2012 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30.01.213.

EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF REVISION PETITION IN MVARP NO. 180 OF 2013.

EXHIBIT P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE VERIFIED PETITION DATED 06.03.2015 IN MVARP NO. 1808/2013 EXHIBIT P7 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 18.11.2014 IN WPC NO. 30690 OF 2014.

EXHIBIT P8 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 20.11.2014.

EXHIBIT P9 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.09.2015 IN WPC NO. 30690 OF 2014.

EXHIBIT P10 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.09.2015 IN WPC NO. 4927 OF 2015.

EXHIBIT P11 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29.10.2015.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 37867 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioners if aggrieved by Ext. P11 order can maintain a revision under Section 90 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. This is particularly so since Ext.P5 revision petition filed by the first petitioner in regard to the settlement of timings earlier is pending consideration with the State Transport Appellate Tribunal.

2.

The petitioners are free to apply for appropriate interim orders in the revision petition if any filed against Ext. P11 order. Any such revision petition shall be heard along with Ext. P5 revision petition within a period of two months from its preferment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS