High Court of KeralaWP(C)/37891/2015disposed of

Ligy Sam v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-15Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 37891 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- LIGY SAM, AGED 39 YEARS W/O ALEXANDER K VARGHESE, VARIKKAVELIL HOUSE THAZHATH VADAKKU PO, ENATHU (VIA), KOLLAM BY ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA RERPESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT EDUVATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645

4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PATHANAMTHITTA 689 645

5. MANAGER M.M.C . CORPORATE MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOLS, PULAMON P.O KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DIST-691 506

6. MANAGER ST. MARYS M.M.G.H.S, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA-691 502 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 37891 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER TO THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT MANAGER, M.M.C. CORPORATE MANAGMENT, KOTTARAKKARA DT. 1/8/06 EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER DT. 28/2/09 EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE DECLARATION OF THE MANAGER OF M.M.C CO-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT DT. 1/8/06 EXT.P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE RULE 51A CLAIMANTS UNDER THE 5TH RESPONDENT EXT.P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED TO 5TH RESPONDENT MANAGER DT. 12/10/11 EXT.P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA DT. 24/8/15 EXT.P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THE POSTAL RECEIPT AND ACKNOWLEDGE CARD RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.37891 of 2015 - J ====================== Dated this the 15th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P7 appeal filed before the 3rd respondent.

2. In such circumstance, the 3rd respondent definitely will have to look at the revision filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 3rd respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/15/12/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.