M/S.Agencia Maritima Logistics Pvt.Ltd. v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38076 of 2015 (H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
-------------------------- M/S.AGENCIA MARITIMA LOGISTICS PVT.LTD.
53/3239, 1ST FLOOR, BHVANESWARY ROAD VYTTILA, PIN - 682 019, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT KERALA, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, SHAJI VARGHESE S/O. POOVATHUNGAL CARIAH VARGHESE AGED 64 FLAT NO. 402, PANCHAVADI APARTMENTS AMBELIPPADAM ROAD, VYTTILA, KOCHI - 19 BY ADVS.SRI.SAJI VARGHESE KAKKATTUMATTATHIL SRI.G.SUBRAMANIAN SRI.ANTONY AUSHAN HIJU RESPONDENT:
---------------------------- ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN P.B. NO. 1895, KALOOR, KOCHI, KERALA - 682 017 BY ADVS. DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.) BY ADVS. SRI.S.PRASANTH, SC, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 38076 of 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT DATED 26.08.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, ALEPPEY EXHIBIT P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMONS DATED 20.02.2015 EXHIBIT P3 :
TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 27.2.2015 EXHIBIT P4 :
TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 30.03.2015 EXHIBIT P5 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6 :
COPY OF THE APPEAL AND STAY PETITION RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.
DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 38076 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2015
JUDGMENT
Ext. P6 appeal numbered as ATA No. 1227/2015 filed against Ext. P5 order is pending disposal. The Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal is yet to commence siting at Bangalore. Ext. P6 appeal is accompanied by a prayer for stay of coercive steps.
2.
It is only proper that coercive steps pursuant to Ext. P5 order are put on hold in the meanwhile. Ext. P6 appeal shall be forwarded to the appropriate bench as soon as the sitting commences. The petitioner shall be put on notice and heard before the interim prayers are considered. The coercive steps pursuant to Ext. P5 order shall be kept in abeyance in the meanwhile.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS