← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/38085/2015disposed of

Ramesan v. The Chairman, 'Kerala Sangeetha Nadaka Academy

2015-12-21Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38085 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS :

-------------------

1. RAMESAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. KUNHIKANNAN, SECRETARY, RANGABHASHA, KOLLAM P.O., KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

2. JOSE T.V., S/O.VARKEY, SECRETARY, KALABHAVAN, P.O. PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

3. GOPAL, S/O.KANNAN, SECRETARY, RANGAMITRA, P.O. ORKATTERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

4. DEVAN, S/O.KUMARAN, SECRETARY, VARADA VADAKARA, P.O. IRINGAL, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.MOHANAN V.T.K.

RESPONDENTS :

----------------------

1. THE CHAIRMAN, 'KERALA SANGEETHA NADAKA ACADEMY THRISSUR - 20.

2. THE SECRETARY KERALA SANGEETHA NADAKA ACADEMY.

3. THE SECRETARY VALLUVANAD-KRISHNA KALANILAYAM, MANISSERY P.O., OTTAPPALAM.

R1 BY SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SENIOR ADVOCATE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 38085 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

COPY OF THE RULES OF THE STATE PROFESSIONAL DRAMA COMPETITION.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).No.38085/2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 21st Day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed challenging the selection of the third respondent from State Professional Drama Competition. The State Professional Drama Competition is underway. The petitioner has not filed process for service of notice to the respondents. Further, this Court is of the view that in a matter like assessment of result in a competition like this, the Court cannot invoke its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms