Sr. Regimole Joseph v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/25TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38087 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------ SR. REGIMOLE JOSEPH, AGED 42 YEARS D/O.JOSEPH, U.P.S.A., ST.MARY'S GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL PAYYANUR, PAYYANUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT PIN: 670 307.
BY ADVS.SRI.MURALI PALLATH SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS:
---------------------- 1.
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT (ANNEX) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KANNUR, THANA P.O.
KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 001.
4.
THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 141.
5.
THE CORPORATE MANAGER, URSULINE CONVENT EDL. AGENCY, UMI, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 38087 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- ----------------------------------- EXT. P1 :
COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 03/01/2005.
EXT. P2 :
COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 13/03/2015 IN WP(C) NO.35292/2009.
EXT. P3 :
COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 15/09/2010.
EXT. P4 :
COPY OF LETTER NO.B3/4599/15 DATED 13/07/2015. EXT. P5 :
COPY OF REVISION PETITION DATED 23/11/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
EXT. P6 :
COPY OF POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 26/11/2015.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.38087 of 2015-I --------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of December, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P5 revision petition pending before the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P5 within a reasonable period. In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P5 revision petition of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the first respondent will consider in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.
//True Copy// P.A. to Judge.
sp/16/12/15