← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/38349/2015disposed of

Sheeba Rajan K. v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-17Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38349 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- SHEEBA RAJAN K. AGED 41 YEARS H.S.A. (ENGLISH), MATTANNUR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KANNUR BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR 670 001. 3.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY, KANNUR 670 101 4.

THE MANAGER, MATTANNUR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KANNUR 670 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 38349 of 2015 (P) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER ISSUED TO THE PETITOINER DATED 01.06.2009 P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 07.12.2010 P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.05.2011 P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.31748 OF 2013 P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 8.10.2015 P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30.06.2015 P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 17.11.2015 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 38349 of 2015 (P) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P7 representation dated 17.11.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 17/12/15