E.A.Rajendran v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/1ST POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38528 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
---------------------- E.A.RAJENDRAN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.ENGOOR AYYAPPAN, ENGOOR HOUSE, THRITHALLOOR P.O., THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CULTURE, STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.
2. THE KERALA SANGEETHA NATAKA ACADEMY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CULTURE, THRISSUR - 680 020.
R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ KUNJACHAN R2 BY SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU,SENIOR ADVOCATE ADVS. SRI.AJEESH K.SASI SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN SRI.R.MANOJ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
WP(C).No. 38528 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE BYELAWS FOR PROFESSIONAL DRAMA COMPETITION OF KERALA SANGEETHA NATAKA ACADEMY FOR THE YEAR 2015 P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 12.11.2015 P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PARKING AREA, THE SEAT FOR AUDIENCE, THE RESPECTIVE STAGE ETC.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
================== W.P.(C).No. 38528 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner challenges non inclusion of play 'Sugandhavyapari' for professional dramas conducted by the 2nd respondent. It appears that the petitioner was selected at zonal level. The petitioner submits that the venue selected for the zonal competition is unfit for their performance and therefore they could not perform to the best of their ability. They seek a direction to take part at State level. It is to be noted that Ext.P2 is the notice pointing out the venue is dated 12.11.2015. The petitioner did not raise any objection before taking part in the competition. The objection has been raised now after selection of the final team to represent the zonal level. In such a circumstances, this Court cannot interfere with selection. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
- : 2 :-