Vinod.M.P v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38677 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- VINOD.M.P AGED 40 YEARS PAVITHRA NIVAS, MARAVANTHURUTHU P.O, VAIKOM.

BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM

2. VIJAYAN, SREEVISHAKHAM, MARAVANTHURUTHU P.O, VAIKOM.

R1 BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 38677 of 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1-TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT ON 17.12.2015.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 38677 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

All that the petitioner prays is that Ext.P1 objection filed by him be considered while allotting time schedule to the second respondent while issuing a temporary permit to him. 2.

I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P1 objection in the exercise as and when the temporary permit is issued to the second respondent.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks