← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/38855/2015disposed of

K.C.Moideen Koya v. Secretary To Government,

2015-12-21Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 38855 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------ K.C. MOIDEEN KOYA, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O. K.C. ABDULLA MOULAVI, CHAIRMAN, K.C. ABDULLA MOULAVI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, CHENNAMANGALLORE, MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE - 673522. BY ADVS.SRI.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER SMT.REHANA SHUKKUR SMT.P.A.ANEESHA SMT.A.P.RUFAIJA RESPONDENTS :

----------------------

1. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.

2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.

3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE - 673001.

4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE - 673012.

R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 38855 of 2015 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

P1:

COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR GETTING RECOGNITION OF SCHOOL DT 31/7/2013 TO THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE.

P2:

COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE R3 DT 24/4/2014. P3:

COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE R4 DT 26/5/2015. P4:

COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE DDE, KOZHIKODE TO THE R2 DT 6/6/2015.

P5:

COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY MAKKAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT DT 10//2015.

P6:

COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT DT 9/11/2015. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

======================== W.P.(C) No.38855 of 2015 - F =============================== Dated this the 21st day of December,2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P2 letter issued by the 3rd respondent before the 1st respondent dated 24.04.2014.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the letter filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st

W.P.(C) No.38855 of 2015 - F respondent will consider, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/21/12/2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.