High Court of KeralaWP(C)/39199/2015disposed of

Koolath Mohammed v. Indian Oil Corporation

2015-12-22Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/1ST POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39199 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- KOOLATH MOHAMMED, DEALER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., NH 17, KAKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT HOUSE OF ZAINA, R.K. MISSION ASHRAM, KALLAI, CALICUT- 673 001, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.RAJENDRAN, KUM.ANJU CLETUS.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, REGISTERED OFFICE, G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA, MUMBAI- 400 051.

2. SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION, IOC REGIONAL OFFICE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI- 682 036.

3. CHIEF DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER, IOC DIVISIONAL OFFICE, II FLOOR, PMK TOWERS, P.O. CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE- 673 020.

BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 39199 of 2015 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DISSOLUTION DEED DATED 21-05-1998. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22-05-1998 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF REGISTRATION FIRM LETTER DATED 03-07-1998.

EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11-11-2000 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 05-11-2001 ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 05-10-2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18-11-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

--------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 39199 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the 3rd respondent by Ext.P7 representation consequent upon the reconstitution of the partnership firm. The petitioner submits that the partnership firm was a dealer under the respondents.

2. This Court is of the view that Ext.P7 shall be considered by the respondent within a period of one month after hearing the petitioner. Till a decision is taken in this matter, there shall not be disruption in the supply. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr