Ullas.P.K v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39444 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- ULLAS.P.K AGED 32 YEARS ASSISTANT TEACHER, CHETTIYATH U.P. SCHOOL, P.O. PUTHUPPANAM BY ADVS.SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL SRI.P.S.BINU RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

3.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 101 4.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VATAKARA, KOCHIKODE DIST. 673 101.

5.

THE MANAGER, CHETTIYATH U.P. SCHOOL, P.O. PUTHUPPANAM, VATAKARA 673 105 6.

HEADMASTER, CHETTIYATH U.P. SCHOOL, P.O. PUTHUPPANAM, VATAKARA 673 105 R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 39444 of 2015 (E) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE STAFF FIXATION ORDER DURING THE PERIOD 2008-2009 P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITOINER P3:

TRUE COPY OF REJECTION ORDER G.O. 317/05 GEN.EDU. DATED 17.08.2005 P4:

TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY 5TH RESPONDENT BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT WHICH WAS ALSO REJECTED BY ORDER DATED 28.10.2009 P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) 4643/12 P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 01.10.2015 UNDER RULE 93 OF CHAPTER XIV OF KER RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 39444 of 2015 (E) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P7 revision dated 01.10.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 23/12/15