← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/39459/2015disposed of

Syno Jose v. The Secretary To Government

2015-12-23Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39459 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------------------

1. SYNO JOSE, W/O. P.M. JOSE, PUTHAMKULAM, OLAMATTAM, THODUPUZHA-685 584.

2. C.M. GEORGE, CHINGAMTHOTTATHIL, OLAMATTAM, THODUPUZHA-685 584.

BY ADVS.SRI.MATHEW JOHN, SRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS (G) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PAINAVU POST, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 501.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.R. RANJITH.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 39459 of 2015 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS AND OTHERS DATED 17/10/2015 BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 39459 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 23nd day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The limited prayer of the petitioners, whose residential houses would be affected by the implementation of the proposal to construct the Marykalungu Chungam bypass as now proposed, is for a direction to the 2nd respondent, before whom, they have submitted Ext.P1 representation under Section 4 of the Right to Fare Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, after hearing the petitioners.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 representation preferred by the petitioners within a period of one month after hearing the petitioners. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das /23.12.15