High Court of KeralaWP(C)/39525/2015disposed of

Rosamma Jose v. The Tahsildar, Thodupuzha

2015-12-23Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39525 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- ROSAMMA JOSE,W/O.JOSE JOHN, AGED 65 YEARS, NIRAPPEL PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, MANAKKADU VILLAGE, ARIKUZHA, VAZHITHALA P.O., THODUPUZHA TALUK, NOW RESIDING AT NIRAPPEL PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, PERINGAZHA KARA, MARADY VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.JOSHI SMT.SIJI K.PAUL RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE THAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA TALUK, THODUPUZHA -685 584

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (R.D.O), IDUKKI -655 602

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT -685 602

4. THE ADDL. THAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA TALUK, THODUPUZHA -685 584 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 39525 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.918/2001 DATED 30.03.01 EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND PETITIONER BY 1ST PETITONER P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE FAIR FIELD REGISTER OF BLOCK NO.11 OF MANAKKAD VILLAGE P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEDURE DATED 28.04.2014 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.10.2006 IN WPC.NO.19625/05 OF THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 12.10.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMNET DATED 01.10.2015 IN WPC.NO.29776/2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.39525 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the second respondent by Ext.P5. According to the petitioner, there are certain anomalies in the resurvey. 2.

This Court is of the view that an appropriate decision shall be taken on Ext.P5 by the second respondent within a period of two months after adverting to the necessary report of the fourth respondent.

The petitioner has also a case that an attempt is being made to include his property in the Zero land project. Till a decision is taken in this matter, status quo shall be maintained.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln