Saramma Mathew v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39638 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- SARAMMA MATHEW AGED 34 YEARS W/O. K. SHABU, HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (JUNIOR) SOCIOLOGY, J.M. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VAKATHANAM P.O. PUTHENCHANTHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 3.

THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 001 4.

THE MANAGER, CATHOLICATE & MD SCHOOLS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT, DEVALOKAM, KOTTAYAM 686 038 R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 39638 of 2015 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR DATE 20.09.2010 P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 02.06.2014 P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR DATED 09.12.2015 P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE MANAGER DATED 15.12.2015 P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 19.12.2015 P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION REPORTED IN 2009 (2) KLT 352 DATED 8.4.2009 P7:

TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.4635/2015/G.EDN. DATED 01.10.2015 OF THE GOVERNMENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 39638 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P5 revision dated 19.12.2015 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 23/12/15