← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/39655/2015disposed of

T.P.Anitha Kumari v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-23Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39655 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- T.P.ANITHA KUMARI AGED 54 YEARS W/O. RAGHAVAN K.V., DRAFTSMAN GRADE II, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H. CIRCLE, KANNUR - 670 012.

BY ADVS.SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ SRI.IVANS C. CHAMAKKAL RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES, (WSC) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2.

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WAGTER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 033 3.

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H. CIRCLE, KANNUR 670 012 4.

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WS.P. SUB DIVISION NO.1, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KANNUR 670 012. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.R. RAJESH R2 TO R4 BY SRI.JOSEPH JOHN, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 39655 of 2015 (F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E.4/80 DATED 17.8.1981 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/HO/E1/7068 (VOL.III)9C DATED 21.3.1991 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT ISSUED PROCEEDINGS VIDE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E1-22615/05 DATED 3.1.2007 P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 11.7.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 39655 of 2015 (F) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P4 representation dated 11.07.2015 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation, in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2nd respondent.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 23/12/15