High Court of KeralaWP(C)/39658/2015disposed of

Jayan.K.S v. P.K.Joseph

2015-12-23Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39658 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

---------- JAYAN.K.S AGED 55 YEARS S/O SIVASANKARAN NAIR RESIDING AT KURIKATTUPUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE NEAR PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MEKKADAMPU KARA VALAKAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM-682 316 BY ADVS.SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S SRI.NOBEL RAJU RESPONDENTS:

-----------

1. P.K.JOSEPH POKKADU VEEDU, MEKKADMB, VALAKAM ERNAKULAM-682 316

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 030

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER VALAKAM VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-6865 661

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER N.H (ROADS) DIVISION, MUVATTUPUZHA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 661

5. THE SCRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 39658 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS -------------------- EXT.P1: THE COPY OF THE DETAILS OF THE CAUSALITIES CAUSED IN THE VALAKOM AREA DT. 6/11/15 ISSUED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMANTION OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA POLICE STATION EXT.P2: THE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 15/9/11 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE MINISTER FOR REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA EXT.P3: THE COPY OF THE REPLY D.T. 14/7/11 ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE REVENUE MINISTER TO THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE sm

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

--------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 39658 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner alleges that the 1st respondent is in illegal possession of Government property. The petitioner had filed a complaint before the Revenue Minister that has been transmitted to the District Collector as per Ext.P3. Therefore, in the light of Ext.P3, necessary action shall be taken by the 2nd respondent-The District Collector, within a period of three months, after hearing the petitioner as well as 1st respondent and also other Officials.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr