← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/39687/2015disposed of

Shajahan V.Y. v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-23Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39687 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------ SHAJAHAN V.Y. AGED 55 YEARS VATTAPARAMBIL HOUSE, UZHUVATHUKADAVU P.O.

KODUNGALLOOR - 680 664.

BY ADVS.SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM SMT.K.R.MONISHA RESPONDENTS:

-----------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FOOD AND SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. SATHEESH P.V PROPRIETOR, STAR TRADERS, X/171. MUNDUR P.O.

THRISSUR - 680 541.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 39687 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS --------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 29323/2006 DT. 04.9.2007. P2 - THE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. F3.4230/06 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DT. 25.11.2007.

P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. GO(ORD) NO. 180/08 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 17.05.2008.

P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 20887/2008 DT. 17.07.2015. P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 20.10.2015.

P6 - TRUE COPY OF GO(ORD) NO. 29/13/FCSD ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 01.02.2013.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE sm

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

---------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 39687 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached the 1st respondent to hear him in the appeal filed by the 2nd respondent as against Ext.P2 order.

2. This Court is of the view that if no final order has been passed in the matter, the petitioner shall also be heard along with the 2nd respondent.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr