High Court of KeralaWP(C)/39689/2015disposed of

Dr. K.R.Muraleedharan Nair v. The Tahasildar

2015-12-23Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39689 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS:

------------

1. DR. K.R.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR AGED 64 YEARS S/O.RAGHAVAN NAIR, NANDANAM, EDAPPALLY P.O EDAPPALLY VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. VASUMATHIAMMA V.P.

WIFE OF P.S.UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 56 YEARS RESIDING AT SREEVISAKH HOUSE, KIDANGOOR VILLAGE MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENTS:

-----------

1. THE TAHASILDAR MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 583.

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER KIDANGOOR VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 583.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686583.

4. TALUK SURVEYOR MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 583. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 39689 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS --------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE DRAFT DATA BANK PREPARED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND WETLAND ACT 2008.

P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER DATED 15.12.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 15.12.15 ESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE sm

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

--------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 39689 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioners approached the Tahsildar to correct the mistakes in relation to the classification of the property in the Basic Tax Register (BTR) by Ext.P3.

2. This Court is of the view that the Tahsildar shall transmit the request to the Additional Tahsildar to take necessary decision on Ext.P3. If it is a mistake, necessarily records shall be corrected. However, if it is not a mistake, there is no power vested with the Tahsildar and the Additional Tahsildar to correct such mistake. Needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioners. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr