High Court of KeralaWP(C)/39709/2015disposed of

Narayanan Kutti v. District Collector

2015-12-23Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/2ND POUSHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 39709 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

---------- NARAYANAN KUTTI AGED 70 YEARS S/O.LAKSHMI AMMA, CHERUTHURUTHI VILLAGE PUTHUSSERI DESAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI RESPONDENTS:

-----------

1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR THRISSUR-680 001.

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER THRISSUR-680 001.

3. THE SECRETARY PADASEKHARA COMMITTEE, VALLATHOL NAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH CHERUTHURUTHY-679 531.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 39709 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------- EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19/2/2015. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE sm

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

--------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 39709 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached the 2nd respondent by Ext.P1 alleging that the 3rd respondent has made a channel through the petitioner's paddy land making it is impossible for the petitioner to cultivate the paddy in his land. Ext.P1 is the complaint.

2. This Court is of the view that the 2nd respondent shall enquire into the complaint and take appropriate decision after hearing the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. Needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE bpr