High Court of KeralaWP(Crl.)/53/2015disposed of

Radhakrishna Pillai v. Aneesh

2015-02-23Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/4TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(Crl.).No. 53 of 2015 (S) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI AGED 48 YEARS S/O.KESAVA PILLAI, RAM NIVAS, KOTTAMKARA VILLAGE KOTTAMKARA CHERRY, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------------------------------

1. ANEESH, AGED 30 YEARS A VPPUKKUTTAN, ATHIRALAYAM, VAYALITHARA EDAVATTOM CHERRY, PERINADU VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 001.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

691 001

3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUNDARA POLICE CIRCLE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

691 001

4. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF KOLLAM CITY. 691 001

5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

691 001 R1 BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH. K.RAJU BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.S.ABDUL KAREEM THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(Crl.).No. 53 of 2015 (S) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 165/2015 OF KUNDARA POLICE STATION OF KOLLAM DISTRICT DATED 26/01/2015. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.V.ASHA, JJ.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl.)No.53 OF 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ramachandran Nair, J.

This writ petition is filed by the father of Ms.Chithra alleging that she is under detention by the first respondent. 2.

After issuance of notice, she was brought before this Court and a Division Bench of this Court has passed an order on 6.2.2015 after interacting with the parties. On that day, she wanted to go along with her parents for two weeks and the Bench permitted her to go with the parents.

Today, she is present along with her parents. We have interacted with the girl. According to her, she was forced by him to leave her home and to undertake the alleged marriage. According to her, there is no marriage itself, whereas the learned counsel for the first respondent submits that there was a marriage properly conducted. 4.

We are not going into the merits of the matter, since the girl

W.P.(Crl.)No.53/2015 has expressed her decision to go along with her parent. We permit her to go along with her parents. The Police Officer, who is present in Court, will render assistance to reach their house. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE P.V.ASHA, JUDGE sv.