← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(Crl.)/150/2015closed

Pushpa Sasi v. The District Police Chief, Pathanamthitta

2015-04-24Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran,Honourable Smt. Justice P.V.Asha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/4TH VAISAKHA, 1937 W.P.(Crl.).No.150 of 2015 (S) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- -------------------------- PUSHPA SASI, AGED 39 YEARS, W/O SASI, VARTTUCHIRAMURUPPEL, PARIYARAM P.O., ELANTHOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.

BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESH KUMAR.

RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689645.

2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOZHENCHERRY - 689641.

3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARANMULA POLICE STATION - 689533.

4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE , CHAVARA POLICE STATION - 691 583.

5. BINU @ KANNAN, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, S/O THANKAN, BHAVANI MANDIRAM, CHENAKKARA MUKKU, THEVALAKKARA PO, CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690524.

6. THANKAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BHAVANI MANDIRAM, CHENAKKARA MUKKU, THEVALAKKARA PO, CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690524.

R1 TO R4 BY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION SRI.ASAF ALI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

K.Vinod Chandran & P.V.Asha, JJ.

---------------------------------------------- W.P.(Crl.).No.150 of 2015-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 24th day of April, 2015

JUDGMENT

K.Vinod Chandran, J.

The alleged detenue was produced in Court and she submits before us that she is not in illegal custody of the 5th respondent. We, hence, directed Syamila Sasikumar to interact with the petitioner, who is the mother. We had also talked both to the petitioner-mother and Syamila Sasikumar, the latter of whom submits that she wants to go with her husband. In the circumstance of the said Syamila Sasikumar having entered into a valid marriage with the 5th respondent, nothing survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition would stand closed. Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran, Judge.

Sd/- P.V.Asha, vku/- Judge.

[ true copy ]