Tasni T.M v. The Commissioner Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/8TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(Crl.).No. 156 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------- PETITIONER:
---------- TASNI T.M AGED 24 YEARS D/O.MAJEED, THANNIYAKKAL HOUSE, KIZHUPPILLYPARAMBU ANJUMURI, THAMMANAM P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.ABRAHAM P.GEORGE SRI.K.VINODKUMAR (707/89) SMT.M.SANTHY RESPONDENTS:
-----------
1. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KOCHI CITY, KOCHI 680011
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION
3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,PALARIVATTOM JANAMYTHRI POLICE STATION,PALARIVATTOM
4. ANNA CHITHRA PIOUS RESIDING AT VIEWPOINT APARTENTS, NEAR KALOOR STADIUM ERNAKULAM BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.KOCHUMOL KODUVATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(Crl.).No. 156 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHBIIT P1 TRUE PHTOO COPY OF THE THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED FROM LIFATUL ISLAM SANGHAM (PONNURUNNI JUMA MASJID) DATED 7-11-2014 EXHBIIT P2 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE CITY POLICE OFFICE,DATED 2-4-2015 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF KOCHI POLICE OFFICE DATED 4-4-2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- NIL (SD/-) TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J & P.V.ASHA, J * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.(Crl).No.156 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of April 2015
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique,J Petitioner, who claims to be the legally wedded wife of the detenue, has approached this Court alleging that the detenue is in the illegal custody of the 4th respondent.
2.
Detenue is produced before this Court today. He is represented by a counsel as well.
3.
On our interaction with the detenue, he submits that he is residing with his parents and he has no relationship with the 4th respondent, as alleged. It is also submitted by the detenue that the petitioner is his legally wedded wife. 4.
Having regard to the aforesaid submission, we do not think it necessary to continue with this writ petition. It is always open for the detenue to choose his own place of residence. The writ petition is closed.
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) (P.V.ASHA, JUDGE) jsr