High Court of KeralaWP(Crl.)/167/2015dismissed

Nelson Paul T. v. The Superintendent Of Police

2015-05-12Honourable Mr.Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim,Honourable Mr. Justice P.B.Suresh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MAY 2015/22ND VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(Crl.).No. 167 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------ NELSON PAUL T., AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. T.K.PAUL, CHITTILAPPILLY THOMMANA, ELINJIPRA P.O.CHOWKA, THRISSUR-680 721.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN SMT.S.INDU RESPONDENTS :

-----------------------

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIKULANGARA POLICE STATION, KODAKARA, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

3. RAJASEKHARAN NAIR , AGED 52 YEARS, KOONANIYIL POURNAMI, KUTTICHIRA P.O., PULINGARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

4. GIRIJA, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O. RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, KOONANIYIL POURNAMI, KUTTICHIRA P.O., PULINGARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. R. RENJITH R3 & R 4 BY ADVS. SRI.S.KANNAN SMT.K.S.SANGEETHA SMT.S.SIMY THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(Crl.).No. 167 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE MESSAGE SENT BY THE DETENUE TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.

& P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.

------------------------------------------------- W.P (Crl.) No. 167 OF 2015 ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 12th DAY OF MAY, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Abdul Rehim, J:

Pursuant to the order passed by this court on 21-042015 the alleged detenue Miss. Surya R. Nair is produced before this court by respondents 3 & 4. We have interacted with the alleged detenue. She had specifically submitted that she is not in any illegal confinement of respondents 3 & 4, as alleged in the writ petition. She had categorically mentioned that she is living with her parents on her own will and she is not intending to marry the petitioner herein. 2.

Under the above mentioned circumstances the writ petition deserves no merit and the same is hereby dismissed.

Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.

Sd/- P.B. SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

AMG True copy P.A. to Judge