← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(Crl.)/201/2015dismissed

Harish P. v. Kumar

2015-05-20Honourable Mr.Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim,Honourable Mr. Justice K.Ramakrishnan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2015/30TH VAISAKHA, 1937 W.P.(Crl.).No. 201 of 2015 (S) ----------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- HARISH P, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O H PICHUMONI, RESIDING AT HARINIVAS, TC 37/683, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695023. BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SANISH RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. KUMAR, AGED 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHOKKANAVEETTIL HOUSE, 95(31/95), NO.4 EROOR, SREYAS NAGAR, THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682306.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRIPUNITHURA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682301.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.V.SABU R2 BY ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SHIBU JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-052015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(Crl.).No. 201 of 2015 (S) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 :

THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE MARRIAGE OFFICER, THRIPUNITHURA SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE BEARING RECEIPT NUMBER BI 466524.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------- NIL //True Copy// P.A. To Judge Bb

C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.

& K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

----------------------------- W.P.(Crl.) No.201 OF 2015 --------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF MAY, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

C.K. Abdul Rehim, J.

The alleged detenue Ms.Sui Kumar is present before the court. We interacted with her. She had specifically stated that she is not in any illegal confinement of her parents as alleged in the writ petition. She expressed desire to go along with the first respondent, who is her father.

2.

Under the above mentioned circumstances, we do not find any merit in the writ petition which is filed raising allegation to the effect that the alleged detenue is in illegal custody of the Ist respondent.

3.

Under the above mentioned circumstances, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. The alleged detenue is permitted to go along with the Ist respondent.

Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.

Sd/- K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.

Bb [True copy] P.A to Judge