High Court of KeralaUNNUMB.Con.Case(C)/82/2015rejected

K.S.Sreekumar v. Sri.Shaik Ahammed

2015-03-20Honourable Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 UNNUMB.Con.Case(C).No. 82 of 2015 () IN WP(C).24319/2011 ---------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 24319/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 06-11-2013 PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P.(C):

--------------------------------------------- K.S.SREEKUMAR, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.P.SREEDHARAN, RETIRED SELECTION GRADE LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY M.S.M.COLLEGE, KAYAMKULAM, RESIDING AT :"SREE VIHAR", H.S.JUNCTION, THAZHAVA P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY RESPONDENT/6TH RESPONDENT IN THE W.P.(C):

------------------------------------------------------ SRI.SHAIK AHAMMED, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) PRINCIPAL, M.S.M.COLLEGE, KAYAMKULAM, PIN 690502 BY ADV.SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR THIS UNNUMBERED COC HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

UNNUMB.Con.Case(C).No. 82 of 2015 () IN WP(C).24319/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1:

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 6.11.2013 IN W.P.(C)NO. 24319/2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT ANNEXURE A2:

TRUE COPY OF G.O. DATED 31.1.2014 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE dlk

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J --------------------------------------- Unnumbered C.O.(C) of 2015 (ZCOC No. 82 of 2015) ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

This unnumbered contempt petition came up before this bench at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to a defect noted by registry regarding the maintainability of the petition. When this matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no orders are called for and the petition may be rejected. In the said circumstances, the objection raised by the registry sustains, this petition is rejected.

Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JUDGE.

dlk