Laxman Ch.Mahanta v. State And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 1704 OF 2013 Laxman Ch. Mahanta .........

Petitioner Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal, Adv.

-versusState of Orissa & Ors.

............

Opposite Parties Mr. K.K.Gaya, ASC

CORAM:

JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

22.03.2022 Order No.

04.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2.

Heard Mr. S.N.Biswal, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. S.P.Sarangi, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.5 and Mr. K.K.Gaya, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. 3.

On the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.5 and referring to the counter affidavit, it reveals that with the efflux of time the matter has become infructuous.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of being infructuous.

( V.Narasingh ) Judge Dhal