← Library
Orissa High CourtWP(C)/183/2022disposed off

Pradeep Kumar Mishra v. State Of Odisha

2022-01-10Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.183 of 2022 Pradeep Kumar Mishra ....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opp. Parties Mr. S. Jena, Standing Counsel for S & ME

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

10.01.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing Mode. 2.

Heard Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. S. Jena, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the School and Mass Education Department.

3.

Petitioner has filed the present writ petition for a direction to the Opposite Parties to consider the case of the Petitioner for grant of similar benefits by antedating promotion and disbursing the arrear salary w.e.f. 28.03.1992 to 05.10.2005 at par with T.G. scale of pay in the light of the benefits granted to similarly situated persons under Annexure-4 within a stipulated period. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Petitioner has filed a representation before the Opposite Party No.1, which is still pending consideration. 4.

Mr. S. Jena, learned Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education Department submits that he will have no objection if a direction is given to the Authority for consideration of the representation of the Petitioner if there is no other legal impediment.

// 2 // 5.

Having heard learned counsel for both the sides, this Court disposes of the writ petition with a direction to the Commissionercum-Secretary, School and Mass Education Department, Govt. of Odisha, Opposite Party No.1 to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner dated 29.04.2021 under Annexure-5 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. In such event, Opposite Party No.1 shall consider the case of the Petitioner in accordance with law and allow the benefits claimed by him, if there is no other legal impediment, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. Decision so taken on the representation of the Petitioner shall be communicated to the Petitioner within ten days of such decision. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

6.

With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned Advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court's Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court's Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021 and Office Order dated 7th January, 2022. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Jagabandhu