Bhagya Laxmi Mallick v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 398 of 2022 Bhagya Laxmi Mallick ....

Petitioner Mr. D.P. Jena, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and another ....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

10.01.2022 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

Order No.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to consider her case taking into account the previous work experience during calculation of total marks and enlisted the name of the petitioner in the provisional selection list published for the district of Jajpur. 3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-6, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection. 4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's notice no. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021. (Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge Ashok