Haramani Das v. Bhagaban Ch.Giri

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

MACA No.1034 of 2016 Smt. Haramani Das and Another .... Appellants Mr. B. Singh, Advocate -versusBhagaban Chandra Giri and Another ....

Respondents Mr. J.R. Deo on behalf of Mr. G.Mishra, Sr. Counsel for R-2

CORAM:

SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

12.10.2022 Order No.

Misc. Case No.1735 of 2016 & MACA No.1034 of 2016 06.

1.

The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. B. Singh, learned counsel for the claimants and Mr. J.R. Deo on behalf of Mr. G. Mishra, learned Senior Counsel for the insurer.

3.

It is submitted by Mr. Singh for the Petitioners that the claimants are the widow and daughter of the deceased and due to poverty they could not prefer the appeal in time. 4.

There is delay of 329 days in preferring the appeal. 5.

Mr. Singh fairly concedes that the claimants have received the compensation amount as directed by the tribunal in time. As such, the submission advanced by the Appellants to condone the delay is not found satisfactory. Resultantly the limitation is not condoned and the Misc. Case is dismissed. Consequently the appeal is dismissed on the ground of limitation.

( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda