Muna Pani v. State And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.1356 of 2013 Muna Pani.

....

Petitioner Mr. S.K. Rout, Adv.

-versusState of Odisha and Ors.

....

Opp. Parties Mr. T. Pattnaik, ASC (for O.P. Nos.1 to 3) Mr. B.B. Routray, Adv.

(for O.P. No.4).

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

10.01.2022 Order No.

06.

1. This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing mode.

2. Mr. S.K. Rout, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Sanganeria, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

4. As the restrictions due to resurgence of Covid-19 are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the Advocate concerned with his/her seal, in the manner prescribed vide

// 2 // Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 and Court's Office Order dated 7th January, 2022.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge ( S.K. Panigrahi) Judge BJ